Skip to main content
Back to Blog
Subject Guide
January 23, 2026
16 min read

Auditing for CPA Board Exam: Complete PSA Standards Guide

Master Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSA) for the CPALE. Covers audit process, risk assessment, evidence gathering, internal controls, and audit reports with study strategies.

CPA Review PH

CPA Review Platform

Auditing tests your understanding of Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSA) and your ability to apply audit concepts to practical scenarios. With 70 multiple-choice questions split between theory and application, this subject requires both memorization and critical thinking.

Understanding the Auditing Exam

Per BOA Resolution No. 30, Series of 2022, Auditing is administered on Day 1 (Afternoon Session) of the CPALE:

  • Questions: 70 MCQs
  • Duration: 3 hours
  • Distribution: 50% Theory, 50% Application
  • Cognitive Levels: 26% Remembering, 56% Understanding, 18% Analyzing

The Exam's Two Components

ComponentWeightFocus
Theory on Auditing & Attestation50%PSA knowledge, definitions, concepts
Auditing Practice50%Risk assessment, procedures, judgment

Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSA) Framework

The Auditing and Assurance Standards Council (AASC) promulgates PSA pronouncements by adopting International Standards on Auditing (ISA) for Philippine use. Here's the complete framework:

PSA 200 Series - General Principles

StandardTitleKey Concepts
PSA 200Overall Objectives of the Independent AuditorReasonable assurance, professional skepticism
PSA 210Agreeing the Terms of Audit EngagementsEngagement letter, preconditions
PSA 220 (Revised)Quality Management for an AuditEngagement partner responsibilities
PSA 230Audit DocumentationWorking paper requirements
PSA 240Auditor's Responsibility Regarding FraudFraud risk factors, management override
PSA 250Consideration of Laws and RegulationsNon-compliance detection
PSA 260Communication with Those Charged with GovernanceRequired communications
PSA 265Communicating Deficiencies in Internal ControlSignificant deficiencies

PSA 300 Series - Risk Assessment and Response

StandardTitleKey Concepts
PSA 300Planning an AuditOverall audit strategy, audit plan
PSA 315 (Revised 2019)Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material MisstatementUnderstanding entity, risk assessment
PSA 320Materiality in Planning and PerformingPerformance materiality
PSA 330Auditor's Responses to Assessed RisksFurther audit procedures

PSA 500 Series - Audit Evidence

StandardTitleKey Concepts
PSA 500Audit EvidenceSufficiency and appropriateness
PSA 501Audit Evidence for Specific ItemsInventory, litigation, segments
PSA 505External ConfirmationsPositive vs. negative confirmations
PSA 520Analytical ProceduresSubstantive analytics
PSA 530Audit SamplingStatistical vs. non-statistical

PSA 700 Series - Reporting

StandardTitleKey Concepts
PSA 700Forming an Opinion and ReportingUnmodified opinion
PSA 705Modifications to the OpinionQualified, adverse, disclaimer
PSA 706Emphasis of Matter and Other MatterAdditional paragraphs
PSA 701Key Audit MattersListed company reporting

The Audit Risk Model (Critical Concept)

Understanding the audit risk model is fundamental to the entire auditing subject:

Audit Risk (AR) = Inherent Risk (IR) × Control Risk (CR) × Detection Risk (DR)

Definitions:

Risk ComponentDefinitionAuditor Control
Inherent RiskSusceptibility to misstatement before controlsCannot control (assess only)
Control RiskRisk that controls won't prevent/detect misstatementCannot control (assess only)
Detection RiskRisk that audit procedures fail to detect misstatementCAN control through procedures

The Inverse Relationship:

  • Higher assessed IR × CR → Lower acceptable DR → More audit work needed
  • Lower assessed IR × CR → Higher acceptable DR → Less audit work needed

Exam Tip: Questions often test the inverse relationship. If control risk increases, detection risk must decrease (meaning more substantive procedures are required).

Internal Control - COSO Framework

Per PSA 315, auditors must understand internal controls using the COSO Framework with five components:

The Five Components

1. Control Environment (Foundation)

  • Integrity and ethical values
  • Commitment to competence
  • Board/audit committee participation
  • Management philosophy and operating style
  • Organizational structure
  • Human resource policies

2. Risk Assessment

  • How management identifies business risks
  • Estimating significance and likelihood
  • Determining risk responses

3. Control Activities

  • Policies and procedures addressing risks
  • Types: Preventive, detective, corrective
  • Categories: Authorization, segregation, physical controls, reconciliation

4. Information and Communication

  • Financial reporting information system
  • Internal and external communication channels
  • Quality of information

5. Monitoring Activities

  • Ongoing monitoring (built into operations)
  • Separate evaluations (internal audit)
  • Reporting deficiencies

Memory Aid: "CRIME" - Control environment, Risk assessment, Information & communication, Monitoring, (control) activitiEs

Audit Evidence Requirements

Sufficiency vs. Appropriateness (PSA 500)

ConceptDefinitionFactors
SufficiencyQuantity of evidenceAssessed risk level, quality of evidence
AppropriatenessQuality of evidenceRelevance + Reliability

Reliability Hierarchy (Most to Least Reliable)

  1. Evidence from independent external sources
  2. Evidence obtained directly by auditor
  3. Documentary evidence (vs. oral)
  4. Original documents (vs. copies)
  5. Evidence from effective internal controls

Types of Audit Procedures

ProcedureDescriptionExample
InspectionExamining records or documentsReviewing invoices
ObservationWatching a process or procedureObserving inventory count
External confirmationDirect response from third partyBank confirmation
RecalculationChecking mathematical accuracyFooting a schedule
ReperformanceIndependently executing controlsRe-running bank reconciliation
Analytical proceduresEvaluating relationshipsComparing ratios to prior year
InquirySeeking information from personnelInterviewing management

Audit Sampling (PSA 530)

Statistical vs. Non-Statistical Sampling

AspectStatisticalNon-Statistical
Selection methodRandom selection requiredAny method acceptable
EvaluationMathematical measurement of sampling riskProfessional judgment
DefensibilityMore objective, defensibleMore subjective

Key Sampling Concepts

Tolerable Misstatement: Maximum misstatement in population that auditor is willing to accept

Tolerable Rate of Deviation: Maximum rate of control deviations that auditor is willing to accept

Sampling Risk: Risk of reaching wrong conclusion due to testing only a sample

For Tests of ControlsFor Substantive Tests
Risk of assessing control risk too lowRisk of incorrect acceptance
Risk of assessing control risk too highRisk of incorrect rejection

Audit Reports and Opinions (PSA 700/705/706)

Types of Audit Opinions

The opinion depends on two factors: (1) nature of the matter, and (2) pervasiveness.

Nature of MatterMaterial but NOT PervasiveMaterial AND Pervasive
Financial statements are misstatedQualified OpinionAdverse Opinion
Inability to obtain sufficient evidenceQualified OpinionDisclaimer of Opinion

Understanding "Pervasive"

Per PSA 705, pervasive effects are those that:

  1. Are not confined to specific elements/accounts
  2. If confined, represent a substantial proportion of the financial statements
  3. In relation to disclosures, are fundamental to users' understanding

Emphasis of Matter vs. Other Matter (PSA 706)

Paragraph TypePurposeEffect on Opinion
Emphasis of MatterDraw attention to matter properly presented in FSNone (opinion remains unmodified)
Other MatterDraw attention to matter NOT presented in FSNone (opinion remains unmodified)

Common Emphasis of Matter situations:

  • Uncertainty about going concern (when properly disclosed)
  • Significant subsequent event
  • Early adoption of new accounting standard

Tests of Controls vs. Substantive Procedures

Comparison Table

AspectTests of ControlsSubstantive Procedures
PurposeEvaluate operating effectiveness of controlsDetect material misstatements
When performedUsually interim periodUsually at/near year-end
Nature of questions"Did the control operate?""Is the balance correct?"
Required?Only when relying on controlsAlways required
ExamplesInspect approvals, reperform reconciliationsConfirm receivables, count inventory

The Relationship

  1. Strong controls → Lower control risk → Can reduce substantive procedures
  2. Weak controls → Higher control risk → Must increase substantive procedures
  3. No reliance on controls → Assess control risk at maximum → Substantive-only approach

High-Yield Topics for the Exam

Based on exam patterns and review center data:

Priority 1: Must Master

  1. PSA 200 - Overall objectives, reasonable assurance, professional skepticism
  2. PSA 315 - Understanding the entity, risk assessment procedures
  3. PSA 330 - Responding to assessed risks
  4. PSA 700/705 - Forming opinions, modifications
  5. Audit risk model - IR × CR × DR relationships

Priority 2: Know Well

  1. PSA 500 - Audit evidence sufficiency and appropriateness
  2. PSA 240 - Fraud considerations
  3. PSA 530 - Audit sampling
  4. COSO Framework - Five components
  5. Internal control types - Preventive vs. detective

Priority 3: Understand Concepts

  1. PSA 260/265 - Communications with governance
  2. PSA 520 - Analytical procedures
  3. PSA 501 - Evidence for specific items
  4. Quality management standards - PSQM 1 and 2

Study Strategies for Auditing

1. Group Standards by Function, Not Number

Instead of memorizing PSA 200, 210, 220... group by audit phase:

Planning Phase: PSA 200, 210, 220, 300, 315, 320 Execution Phase: PSA 330, 500, 501, 505, 520, 530 Completion Phase: PSA 700, 705, 706, 560, 570

2. Understand Before Memorizing

Focus on understanding why each standard exists:

  • PSA 240 exists because management can override controls
  • PSA 315 exists because you can't respond to risks you haven't identified
  • PSA 705 exists because users need to know when something is wrong

3. Create Decision Trees for Report Modifications

Is there a misstatement or scope limitation?
├── No → Unmodified Opinion
└── Yes → Is it material?
    ├── No → Unmodified Opinion
    └── Yes → Is it pervasive?
        ├── No → Qualified Opinion
        └── Yes → Is it a misstatement?
            ├── Yes → Adverse Opinion
            └── No (scope) → Disclaimer

4. Practice Application Questions

Don't just memorize definitions. Practice scenarios like:

  • "The auditor discovered management had been inflating revenue for three years. What type of opinion should be issued?"
  • "The client's legal counsel refused to respond to the auditor's inquiry about pending litigation. What is the effect?"

5. Know the New Quality Management Standards

PSQM 1 (effective December 15, 2022) replaced PSQC 1 with eight components:

  1. Firm's risk assessment process
  2. Governance and leadership
  3. Relevant ethical requirements
  4. Acceptance and continuance
  5. Engagement performance
  6. Resources
  7. Information and communication
  8. Monitoring and remediation process

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Conceptual Errors

  • Confusing qualified (material, not pervasive) with adverse (material, pervasive)
  • Thinking Emphasis of Matter affects the opinion (it doesn't)
  • Believing higher detection risk means more work (it's the opposite)

Application Errors

  • Not recognizing when controls are ineffective (requires substantive-only approach)
  • Forgetting that some substantive procedures are always required
  • Confusing tests of controls (effectiveness) with tests of details (correctness)

Time Management

  • Spending too long on scenario questions
  • Second-guessing straightforward definition questions
  • Not flagging difficult questions for later review

Recommended Study Approach

Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-2)

  • Read through all major PSA standards
  • Understand the audit process flow
  • Master the audit risk model

Phase 2: Deep Study (Weeks 3-4)

  • Study each PSA series systematically (200s, 300s, 500s, 700s)
  • Create summary sheets per standard
  • Practice MCQs per topic

Phase 3: Integration (Weeks 5-6)

  • Take full-length mock exams
  • Analyze wrong answers thoroughly
  • Focus on weak areas

Phase 4: Final Review (Last Week)

  • Review summary sheets
  • Focus on high-yield topics
  • Light practice, no new material

Official Resources


Auditing rewards understanding over memorization. Focus on the logical flow of the audit process, master the relationships between risk and response, and practice applying standards to scenarios. With systematic preparation, you can confidently tackle any audit question on the board exam.

Ready to master Auditing? Start your free trial and access AI-powered practice questions covering all PSA standards.